“A Gentle Creature” by Fyodor Dostoevsky and “The Barrier” by Pavel Vezhinov: Systematic and Comparative Reading

Download:

PDF
Author: Inna Dmitrievna Gazheva
Information about the author:

Ph.D. in Philology, Associate Professor of the Ilarion Svientsitskyi Department of Slavic Philology, Ivan Franko National University (Lviv).

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
For citation:

Gazheva I. “A Gentle Creature” by Fyodor Dostoevsky and “The Barrier” by Pavel Vezhinov: Systematic and Comparative Reading. Dostoevsky and World Culture, Philological journal, 2020, No. 3(11), pp. 180-217.
Issue: 2020 no. 3 (11)
Department: COMPARATIVE STUDIES
Pages: 180-217
DOI: https://doi.org/7. https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2020-3-180-217
UDK: 821.16.1+821.163.2+1
BBK: 83+83.3(2=411.2)+86.2
Keywords: Fyodor Dostoevsky, Pavel Vezhinov, “A Gentle Creature”, “The Barrier”, external composition, focalization, artistic time, spatial organization, rite de passage, transformation.
Abstract: The article attempts to identify systemic intertextual connections between novellas “The Barrier” by Pavel Vezhinov and “A Gentle Creature” by Fyodor Dostoyevsky (as well as individual intertextual connections between “The Barrier” and “The Dream of a Ridiculous Man”) and show how their explication contributes to the comprehension of the artistic concept of each of the works. The methodological basis of the study is the interpretation of intertextuality as a product of reading (not as a phenomenon of “writing”), according to which Vezhinov and Dostoevsky – writers belonging to different national cultures and historical eras – in some sense become contemporaries. Accordingly, “A Gentle Creature”, written earlier, is enriched in meaning as a result of its comparison with “The Barrier”, as well as the latter by comparison with the story of Dostoevsky. The basis for comparing the stories is the similarity at the level of the storylines, the narrative type, the system of the characters. At the same time, the ways of transforming the storyline into a plot, such as: external composition, focalisation, organization of modal-temporal and spatial plans, are deeply different. The spatial organization of the works plays a particularly important role in this sense, since the storyline of both stories is based on one type of rite de passage – the transition from life “to another life”. This article is devoted to the question of whether this transition took place and whether, as a result, the spiritual transformation of the main characters took place.

References

1. Bogdanova O.A. Pod sozvezdiem (Khudozhestvennaia proza rubezha ХІХ-ХХ veka v aspekte zhanrovoi poetiki russkoi klassicheskoi literatury) [Under the Constellation (Artistic Prose in the Turn of the 19th-20th Centuries in terms of the Poetics of Genre of Russian Classical Literature)]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Kulaginoi-Іntrada Publ., 2008. 312 p. (In Russ.)

2. Bugaeva L. Literatura i rite de passage [Literature and rite de passage]. Saint Petersburg, ID “Petropolis” Publ., 2010. 386 p. (In Russ.)

3. Vezhinov P. Izbrannoe. V 2-h t. [Favorite. In Two Vols.] Vol.2. Bar’er; Izmerenija: Povesti; Vesy: Roman. Per. s bolg. [The Barrier, Measures, Tales., Libra: a Novel. Trans. From Bulgarian] Moscow, Hudozh. lit. Publ., 1985. 383 p. (In Russ.)

4. Vezhinov P. Fantastichnoto – edin kljuch kom tajnata za choveka: Intervju na E.Rajcheva ot 1982 g. [The Fantastic – One Key to the Secret for Man: An Interview by E. Raicheva from 1982]. Kniga za P. Vezhinov. Sofija, 1986, pp. 208-213. (in Bulg.)

5. Gazheva I.D. “…egda zahozhdashe solnce”: svet vechernij v proizvedenijah F.M. Dostoevskogo i Andreja Belogo [“…while the Sun Was Setting”: the Evening Light in the Works of F. M. Dostoyevsky and Andrei Bely]. Dostoevskii i mirovaja kul’tura. Filologicheskii zhurnal [Dostoevsky and World Culture. Philological Journal], 2020, No. 1(9), pp. 51-82.

6. Dostoevskii F.M. Poln. sobr. soch.: v 30 t. [Complete works: in 30 vols.]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1972–1990. (In Russ.)

7. Esaulov Y. Khudozhestvennyi mir Dostoevskogo v svete oppozitsii “iurodstvo/shutovstvo” i pozitsiia Bakhtina: na materiale fantasticheskogo rasskaza “Krotkaia” [Dostoevsky’s Fictional World in the Light of the “Foolishness for Christ/Buffoonery” Opposition and Bakhtin’s Position: With Reference to the Fantastic Story A Gentle Creature]. Dostoevskii i mirovaya kul’tura. Almanach. [Dostoevsky and World Culture. Almanac.] 2018. No. 36. Saint Petersburg, Serebryanyj vek Publ., pp. 75-86. (In Russ.)

8. Zhennet Zh. Raboty po poetike [Works on poetics]. Moscow, Yzdatel"stvo ymeny Sabashnykovych Publ. Available at: http://niv.ru/doc/zhenett-raboty-po-poetike/utopiyaliteratury.htm (last accessed: 03.02.2020) (In Russ.)

9. Igumen N Prishel’cy: Novaja kul’tura. Novaja religija. Novyj chelovek [Newcomers: A New Culture. A New Religion. A New Man]. Ot chego nas hotjat “SPASTI” NLO, jekstrasensy, okkul'tisty, magi [From What are “saving” us UFO, Extrasensory, Occultists, Wizards]. Moscow, Danilovskij blagovestnik. S., Rodnoe slovo Publ., 2009, pp. 5-365. (In Russ.)

10. Kasatkina T.A. Sviashchennoe v povsednevnom: dvusostavnyi obraz v proizvedeniiakh F.M. Dostoevskogo. [The Sacred in the Ordinary: the Two-folded Image in Dostoevsky’s Texts]. Moscow, IMLI RAN Publ., 2015. 528 p. (In Russ.)

11. Klassifikacija psihicheskih rasstrojstv MKB-10. Klinicheskie opisanija i diagnosticheskie ukazanija [Classification of Mental Disorders ICD-10. Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Instructions]. Available at: http://web.krao.kg/10_psihologia/0_pdf/5.pdf (last accessed: 03.02.2020) (In Russ.)

12. Lotman Ju.M. Hudozhestvennoe prostranstvo Gogolja [Art space in the Prose of Gogol]. Lotman Ju.M. O russkoj literature. Stat'i i issledovanija (1958–1993). Istorija russkoj prozy. Teorija literatury. [About Russian Literature. Articles and researches (1958-1993). History of Russian Prose. Theory of Literature] Saint Petersburg, Iskusstvo Publ., pp. 622–658. (In Russ.)

13. Lotman Ju.M. Struktura hudozhestvennogo teksta [The Structure of the Artistic Text]. Lotman Ju.M. Ob iskusstve. [About Art]. Saint Petersburg, Iskusstvo - SPb Publ., 1998, pp. 14–85. Available at: https://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/Literat/Lotman/_15.php (last accessed: 26.03.2020) (In Russ.)

14. Mihnovec, N.G. 136-j psalom v tvorchestve Dostoevskogo [136 Psalm in the Works of Dostoevsky]. Dostoevskij. Materialy i issledovanija [Dostoevsky. Materials and Studies]. Vol. 17. Saint Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2005, pp.61–91 (In Russ.).

15. Rannie slavjanofily: A.S. Homjakov, I.V. Kireevskij, K.S. i I.S. Aksakovy [Early Slavophiles: A.S. Khomyakov, I.V. Kireevsky, K.S. and I.S. Aksakov]. Ed. by N.L. Brodskij. Moscow, T-vo I.D. Sytina, 1910. LXVI, 206 p. (In Russ.)

16. Sedakova O.A. “Neudavshaiasia epifaniia”: dva khristianskikh romana, “Idiot” i “Doktor Zhivago” [A “Failed Epiphany”: Two Christian Novels, “The Idiot” and “Doctor Zhivago”]. Sedakova O. A. Chetyre toma. Tom ІІІ. Poetica. [Works in Four Volumes. Vol. III. Poetics.] Moscow, PROMEDIA. Russkii fond sodeistviia obrazovaniiu i nauke Publ., 2010, pp.376-393. (In Russ.)

17. Sedakova O.A. O pokajanii i raskajanii [On Repentance and Penance.]. Available at: http:// www.olgasedakova.com/Moralia/1775 (last accessed: 18.03.2020) (In Russ.)

18. Solov’ev S.M. Izobrazitel’nye sredstva v tvorchestve F.M. Dostoevskogo. Ocherki [Visual Tools in the Works of F. M. Dostoevsky. Essays]. Moscow, Sovetskiy Pisatel’ Publ., 1979. 352 p. (In Russ.)

19. Stepanjan K.A. Javlenie i dialog v romanah F. M. Dostoevskogo [Phenomenon and Dialogue in the Novels of F.M. Dostoevsky]. Saint Petersburg, Kriga Publ., 2010. 400 p. (In Russ.)

20. Stepanjan K.A. Dostoevskij i Servantes: dialog v bol'shom vremeni [Dostoyevsky and Cervantes. The dialogue in the Big Time]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury Publ., 2013. 368 p. (In Russ.)

21. Suzi V. N. Ikona v povesti Dostoevskogo «Krotkaja»: o dominantnoj i sluzhebnoj detali [The Icon in Dostoevsky’s Short Story “A Gentle Creature”: on the Dominant and Service Detail]. Available at: http://litbook.ru/article/9746/ (last accessed: 12.01.2020) (In Russ.)

22. Toporov V.N. O strukture romana Dostoevskogo v sviazi s arkhaichnymi skhemami mifologicheskogo myshleniia [“Prestuplenie i nakazanie”] [On the Structure of a Dostoevsky’s Novel in Connection with Archaic Schemes of Mythological Thinking (“Crime and Punishment”)]. Toporov V. N. Mif. Ritual. Simvol. Obraz. Issledovaniia v oblasti mifopoeticheskogo. Izbrannoe [Myth. Ritual. Symbol. Image. Selected works on Mythopoetic]. Moscow, IG “Progress” – “Kul’tura” Publ., 1995, pp.193-258. (In Russ.)

23. Tjupa V.I. Diskursnye formacii: ocherki po komparativnoj ritorike [Discourse Formations: Essays on Comparative Rhetoric]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Jurajt Publ., 2018. 274 p. (In Russ.)

24. Chzhan Bjangje Ljubov’, zablokirovannaja gordynej: ob illjuzornosti sistemy i mehanizme smerti v rasskaze “Krotkaja” [Love Blocked by Pride: about the “System” Illusiveness and Mechanism of Death in F.M. Dostoyevsky’s story “A Gentle Creature]. Dostoevskii i mirovaja kul’tura. Al’manakh [Dostoevsky and World Culture. Almanac], 2018, No. 22, pp. 85-101(In Russ.)

25. Shmid V. Narratologija [Narratology]. Moscow, Jazyki slavjanskoj kul'tury Publ., 2003. 312 p. (In Russ.)