Charles Gounod’s Faust and Dostoevsky Artistic Principles

Download:

PDF
Author: Tatyana V. Kovalevskaya
Information about the author:

D.Sc. in Philosophy, Docent, Full Professor, European Languages Department, Institute of Linguistics, Russian State University for the Humanities, 6 Miusskaya Sq., 125993 Moscow, Russia.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0527-2289

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
For citation:

Kovalevskaya, T.V. “Charles Gounod’s Faust and Dostoevsky Artistic Principles”. Dostoevsky and World Culture. Philological journal, no. 2 (14), 2021, pp. 89-115. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2021-2-89-115
Received: 10 Apr. 2021
Published: 25 Jun. 2021
Issue: 2021 no. 2(14)
Department: POETICS. CONTEXT
Pages: 89-115
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2021-2-89-115
UDK: 821.161.1.0
BBK: 83.3(2=411.2)
Keywords: The Adolescent, Hector Berlioz, Symphonie Fantastique, polyphony, Mikhail Bakhtin, Arnold Schoenberg
Abstract: the article considers the “Faustian” scene in Fyodor Dostoevsky’s The Adolescent as the musical embodiment of Dostoevsky’s central poetic device: statements with maximum formal similarity and maximum semantic divergence. This device is contextualized within Mikhail Bakhtin’s polyphonic novel concept and within the context of the history of polyphony as a musical phenomenon starting with its origins in the Western European music. We follow Larisa Gogotishvili’s suggestion that Mikhail Bakhtin’s polyphony is not the polyphony of the 18th-19th century (Johann Sebastian Bach, for instance) but the 20th-century polyphony (Arnold Schoenberg) and propose that Bakhtin’s and Dostoevsky’s concepts of polyphony have different origins (relativist in Bakhtin and epistemological in Dostoevsky) and consequently serve different purposes: Bakhtin affirms a multiplicity of voices as a matter of principle, while Dostoevsky strives to ultimately overcome this multiplicity by covering as many concepts of reality as possible. The breadth of Dostoevsky’s conceptual range is intended to overcome humans’ epistemological limitations and avoid dangerous cognitive traps that lie in statements that are formally close, but semantically different.

References

1. Apollodorus. Mifologicheskaia biblioteka [The Bibliotheca]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1972. 216 p. (in Russ.)

2. Athanasius the Great. Poslanie o postanovleniiakh Nikeiskogo Sobora. [The Epistle on the Rulings of the Council of Nicea]. Azbuka very. azbyka.ru/otechnik/Afanasij_Velikij/poslanie_o_tom_ chto_Sobor_Nikejskiy/ (accessed 06 Apr. 2021) (in Russ.)

3. Babichev, N.T., and Borovskii, Ia.M. Latinsko-russkii slovar krylatykh slov i vyrazhenii [Latin-Russian Dictionary of Popular Words and Sayings]. Moscow, Russkii iazyk Publ., 1999. 784 p. (in Russ.)

4. Byron, G.G. Sobranie sochinenii v 4 t. [Collected Works in 4 Vols.] Moscow, Pravda Publ., 1981. (in Russ.)

5. Bakhtin, M.M. Sobranie sochinenii 7 t. [Collected Works in 7 Vols.] Moscow, Russkie slovari Publ., 1996–. (in Russ.)

6. Belov, S.V. F.M. Dostoevskii i ego okruzhenie. Entsiklopedicheskii slovar 2 t. [F.M. Dostoevsky and His Circle. Encyclopedic Dictionary in 2 Vols.] Saint Petersburg, Aleteiia: Rossiiskaia natsionalnaia biblioteka Publ., 2001. (in Russ.)

7. Bitsilli, P.M. “K voprosu o vnutrennei forme romanov Dostoevskogo” [“On the Inner Form of Dostoevsky’s Novels”]. Izbrannye trudy po filologii [Selected Philological Works], Moscow, Nasledie Publ., 1996, pp. 483–549. (in Russ.)

8. Bonetskaia, N.K. “Bakhtin glazami metafizika” [“Bakhtin Through the Eyes of a Metaphysician”]. Dialog. Karnaval. Khronotop, no. 1, 1998, pp. 103–155. (in Russ.)

9. Garicheva, E.A. “O dialoge u Dostoevskogo” [“On Dialog in Dostoevsky”]. Literaturovedcheskii zhurnal, no. 16, 2002, pp. 38–44. (in Russ.)

10. Goethe, J.W. Faust. Translated by N. Kholodkovsky. Moscow, AST Publ., 2019. 544 p. (in Russ.)

11. Gogotishvili, L.A. “Vklad postsimvolistov Loseva i Bakhtina v teoriiu postroeniia diskursa (printsipialnye razlichiia na fone fundamentalnogo skhodstva)” [“Post-Symbolists Losev’s and Bakhtin’s Contribution to the Discourse Theory (Principled Differences Against the Backdrop of Fundamental Similarity)”]. Filologiia: nauchnye issledovaniia, no. 4 (16), 2014, pp. 354–368. DOI: 10.7256/2305-6177.2014.4.13430 (in Russ.)

12. Gogotishvili, L.A. “Sootnoshenie mezhdu polifonicheskim romanom M. Bakhtina i muzykalnoi polifoniei (zamechaniia k probleme)” [“The Relation Between Mikhail Bakhtin’s Polyphonic Novel and Musical Polyphony”]. Voprosy filosofii, no. 3, 2019, pp. 142–156. (in Russ.)

13. Gozenpud, A. Dostoevskii i muzyka [Dostoevsky and Music]. Leningrad, Muzyka Publ., 1971. 175 p. (in Russ.)

14. Dostoevsky, F.M. Poln. sobr. soch.: 30 t. [Complete Works in 30 Vols.] Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1972–1990. (in Russ.)

15. Evdokimova, Iu.K. Mnogogolosie srednevekovia. X-XIV veka. [The Medieval Polyphony]. Istoriia polifonii [History of Polyphony], issue 1, Moscow, Muzyka Publ., 1983. 454 p. (in Russ.)

16. Zakharov, V.N. “Khudozhestvennaia antropologiia Dostoevskogo” [Dostoevsky’s Poetic Anthropology”]. Problemy istoricheskoi poetiki [Problems of Historical Poetics], 2013, pp. 150–164. (in Russ.)

17. Irenaeus of Lyon. Oblichenie i oproverzhenie lzheimennogo znaniia (Protiv eresei). Kniga tretia. [Five Books Against Heresies. Book Three]. Azbuka very. azbyka.ru/otechnik/Irinej_Lionskij/ protiv-eresej/3 (accessed 06 Apr. 2021) (in Russ.)

18. Losev, A.F. Estetika Vozrozhdeniia [The Aesthetics of the Renaissance]. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1978. 623 p. (in Russ.)

19. Miuller, T.F. Polifoniia: Uchebnik [Polyphony: Student’s Book]. Moscow, Muzyka Publ., 1989. 335 p. (in Russ.)

20. Petrova, G. “Posviashchenie ‘Fantasticheskoi simfonii’ Gektora Berlioza Nikolaiu I. Uspekh ili neuspekh?” [“Hector Berlioz’s Symphonie Fantastique and its Dedication to Nicholas I. Success or Failure?”] Muzyka v kulturnom prostranstve Evropy-Rossii. Sobytiia, lichnost, istoriia [Music in the Cultural Space of Europe-Russia. Events, Personality, History], Saint Petersburg, Rossiiskii institut istorii iskusstv Publ., 2014, pp. 104–118. (in Russ.)

21. Potapova, N. “Stsenograf prevratilsia v rezhissera” [“Stage Designer Turned Director”]. Belcanto.ru, 6 May 2013, www.belcanto.ru/13050601.html (accessed 06 Apr. 2021) (in Russ.)

22. Serov, A.N. Izbrannye stati 2 t. [Selected Articles in 2 Vols.] Moscow; Leningrad, Gosmuzizdat Publ., 1950. 627 p. (in Russ.)

23. Stepanian, K.A. Shekspir, Bakhtin i Dostoevskii. Geroi i avtory v bolshom vremeni. [Shakespeare, Bakhtin, and Dostoevsky: Characters and Authors in Great Time]. Moscow, Global Kom: Iazyki slavianskoi kultury Publ., 2016. 296 p. (in Russ.)

24. Tarasova, N.A. “Faustovskaia stsena v romane Dostoevskogo ‘Podrostok’” [“The Faustian Scene in Dostoevsky’s Novel The Adolescent”]. Russkaia literatura, no. 1, 2010, pp. 171–187. (in Russ.)

25. Tarasova, N.A. Problemy tekstologii Dostoevskogo: roman “Podrostok” i “Dnevnik pisatelia” za 1876–1877 gg. [Problems of Dostoevsky’s Textual History: The Adolescent and A Writer’s Diary for the Years 1987–1877]. Dr. Hab. Thesis. Moscow, 2011. (in Russ.)

26. Tikhomirov, B.N. “Dostoevskii i ego personazhi v teatralnykh kreslakh, na kontsertakh i v uveselitelnykh zavedeniiakh. 1837–1849 (iz materialov k entsiklopedicheskomu spravochniku ‘Peterburg Dostoevskogo’)” [“Dostoevsky and His Characters in Theaters, at Concerts, and Recreational Establishments. 1837-1849 (From the Materials for the Dostoevsky’s St. Petersburg Encyclopedic Guidebook)”]. Neizvestnyi Dostoevsky, no. 4, 2019, pp. 5–56. DOI: 10.15393/j10. art.2019.4241 (in Russ.)

27. Tonchuk, P.O. “Polifonicheskii roman Dostoevskogo (v kontseptsii M.Bakhtina) i fuga: opyt sravnitelnogo analiza” [“Dostoevsky’s Polyphonic Novel (As Conceptualized by Mikhail Bakhtin) and the Fugue: An Attempt at Comparative Analysis”]. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i iuridicheskie nauki, kulturologiia i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, no. 5 (43), 2014, pp. 184–188. (in Russ.)

28. Shakespeare, William. Sobranie sochinenii 8 t. [Collected Works in 8 Vols.] Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1960 (in Russ.)

29. Analecta hymnica medii avii. XXI. Cantiones et muteti. Leipzig, O.R. Reisland, 1895. 226 p. (in Latin)

30. Barbier, Jules, and Michel Carré. Faust. Opéra en cinq actes. Paris, Michel Lévy frères, Libraires-éditeurs, 1859. 72 p. (in French)

31. Gounod, Charles. Faust [video; 1985 staging; directed by Ken Russell, conducted by Erich Binder, Wiener Staatsopera Orchestra]. YouTube, 11 Nov. 2012, www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-ffmoJUJVU (accessed 06 Apr. 2021) (in French)

32. Morson, Gary Saul. “Gogol’s Parables of Explanation: Nonsense and Prosaics”. Essays on Gogol. Logos and the Russian Word. Susanne Fusso, Priscilla Meyer, eds. Evanston, Ill., Northwestern University Press, 1992, pp. 203–239. (in English)

33. Novikoff, Alex J. The Medieval Culture of Disputation: Pedagogy, Practice, and Performance. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013. 336 p. (in English)

34. Perotin. “Viderunt Omnes” [audio; performed by The Hilliard Ensemble]. YouTube, 15 Feb. 2015, www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPZrMpFnygw (accessed 06 Apr. 2021) (in Latin)

35. Philippus Cancellarius. “Quisquis Cordis et Oculi” [audio; performed by Universalia in Re]. YouTube, 7 Dec. 2011, www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcbxCy-Uqes (accessed 06 Apr. 2021) (in Latin)

36. Schönberg, A. “Variations. Op. 31” [audio; Chicago Symphony Orchestra conducted by Daniel Barenboim]. YouTube, 14 Sep. 2016, www.youtube.com/watch?v=iL1XzH6gpAY (accessed 06 Apr. 2021)