Porfiry Petrovich as Socrates in the Plot of Crime and Punishment

Download:

PDF
Author: Nina S. Ishchenko
Information about the author:

PhD in Philosophy, Lugansk State Agrarian University named by K.E. Voroshilov, Gorodok LNAU 1, Artemovsky district, 91008 Lugansk, LPR.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8616-7087

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
For citation:

Ishchenko, N.S. “Porfiry Petrovich as Socrates in the Plot of Crime and Punishment.” Dostoevsky and World Culture. Philological journal, no. 2 (22), 2023, pp. 45–56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2023-2-45-56
Received: 06 Apr. 2023
Published: 25 Jun. 2023
Issue: 2023 no. 2 (22)
Department: HERMENEUTICS. SLOW READING
Pages: 45-56
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2023-2-45-56
EDN:

https://elibrary.ru/JZXDVI
UDK: 821.161.1.0+1(091)
BBK: 87+83.3(2=411.2)5
Keywords: Fyodor Dostoevsky, Plato, Alcibiades, Socrates, philosophy, text of behavior, dramatic paradigm, dialogicality.
Abstract: The important role of dialogism in Dostoevsky’s work makes it possible to turn to the philosophy of Plato, another recognized master of philosophical dialogue, for the analysis of his characters. In the twentieth century, the dramatic paradigm of the study of Platonic philosophy is actively developing, and special attention is paid to the characters involved, time, place, and circumstances of the dialogues, as a possibility to better understand the depth of Plato’s thought. The same approach is used in the article to read the behavior of the characters in Crime and Punishment. In this piece of research, two characters of the novel are analyzed within the framework of the dramatic paradigm: Raskolnikov and Porfiry Petrovich. It is shown that their images and interaction are built according to the main Platonic plot, that is, the conversation between the sage Socrates and a young ambitious man that is forced by him to abandon his plans. A similar plot is developed in several dialogues of Plato and is especially pronounced in the fate of Alcibiades, the famous disciple of Socrates. Alcibiades is a well-known “Napoleonic” hero in ancient history, easily stepping over blood for the sake of his goals. Raskolnikov writes about such people in the article that attracted the attention of Porfiry Petrovich. Raskolnikov also notes that such people often die in collision with society, which happened to Alcibiades. These elements allow us to consider Raskolnikov himself as Alcibiades in the plot of the novel. During three dialogues with Porfiry Petrovich, Raskolnikov changes his views, renounces his claims, and obeys the law. Alcibiades behaved in the same way after his conversations with Socrates. In addition to this main dramatic moment, Porfiry Petrovich has several common features with Socrates, such as his appearance, metamorphism, and the desire to know the human soul. Thus, in terms of image, ideas, and functions, Porfiry Petrovich acts as the Socrates of the plot, seeking the rebirth of a young ambitious man with greater success than his ancient counterpart. 

References

1. Bakhtin, M.M. Izbrannoe [Selected Works], vol. 2: Poetika Dostoevskogo [Dostoevsky’s Poetics]. Ed. by N.K. Bonetskaia. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ Publ., 2017. 512 p. (In Russ.)

2. Vetlovskaia, V.E. “Logicheskaia osnova khudozhestvennogo teksta, ili Chto skryvaet Porfirii Petrovich v ‘Prestuplenii i nakazanii’ F.M. Dostoevskogo?” [“The Logical Basis of a Literary Text, or What Does Porfiry Petrovich Hide in F.M. Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment?”]. Problemy istoricheskoi poetiki, vol. 18, no. 1, 2020, pp. 239–259. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.15393/j9.art.2020.7262

3. Vetlovskaia, V.E. “Prototipy geroev Dostoevskogo: pristav sledstvennykh del Porfirii Petrovich i ne tol’ko” [“Prototypes of Dostoevsky’s Characters: Bailiff for Investigative Cases Porfiry Petrovich and Others”]. Slovesnost’ i istoriia, no. 4, 2022, pp. 68–102. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31860/2712-7591-2022-68-102

4. Dostoevskii, F.M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 30 tomakh [Complete Works: in 30 vols]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1972–1990. (In Russ.)

5. Manolakev, Kh.P. “Porfirii Petrovich i Raskol’nikov: germenevtika dvoinichestva” [“Porfiry Petrovich and Raskolnikov: Hermeneutics of Doubles”]. Filologicheskii klass, vol. 26, no. 4, 2021, pp. 50–62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51762/1FK-2021-26-04-04 

6. Plato. “Gorgii” [“Gorgias”]. Sochineniia v 4 tomakh [Works in 4 vols], vol. 1. Ed. by A.F. Losev and V.F. Asmus; trans. from Ancient Greek. St. Petersburg, Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta, Izd-vo Olega Abyshko Publ., 2006, pp. 261–374. (In Russ.)

7. Prokopenko, V.V. “Narratologicheskii povorot i stanovlenie dramaticheskoi paradigmy v platonovedenii” [“Narratological Turn and the Formation of the Dramatic Paradigm in Platonic Studies”]. Vestnik Russkoi khristianskoi gumanitarnoi akademii, vol. 14, no. 3, 2013, pp. 28–33. (In Russ.)

8. Protopopova, I.A. “Platonovskii ‘Pir’ kak silen i androgin” [“Plato’s Symposium as Strong and Androgynous”]. Vestnik Russkoi khristianskoi gumanitarnoi akademii, vol. 16, no. 4, 2015, pp. 418–423. (In Russ.)

9. Protopopova, I.A. “Sokrat kak ‘sushchnost’’ i ‘metod’: elenkhos i aporiia” [“Socrates as ‘Essence’ and ‘Method’: elenchos and aporia”]. Platonovskie issledovaniia, vol. 11, no. 2, 2019, pp. 83–98. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25985/PI.10.2.04

10. Piatigorskii, A.M., and Uspenskii, B.A. “Personologicheskaia klassifikatsiia kak semioticheskaia problema” [“Personological Classification as a Semiotic Problem”]. Trudy po znakovym sistemam, issue III, 1967, pp. 7–29. (In Russ.)

11. Svetlov, R.V. “Sokrat v prostranstve antichnogo voobrazheniia” [“Socrates in the Space of the Ancient Imagination”]. ΣΧΟΛΗ, vol. 9, no. 1, 2015, pp. 169–184. (In Russ.)

12. Tikhomirov, B.N. “Lazar’! Griadi von”. Roman F.M. Dostoevskogo “Prestuplenie i nakazanie” v sovremennom prochtenii. Kniga-kommentarii [“Lazarus! Come Out.” A Contemporary Reading of Dostoevsky’s Novel Crime and Punishment. Book-Commentary]. St. Petersburg, Serebriannyi vek Publ., 2005. 472 p. (In Russ.)