The Hero’s Journey in Dostoevsky’s Early Works and Crime and Punishment

Download:

PDF
Author: Tatiana G. Magaril-Il’iaeva
Information about the author:

PhD in Philology, Senior Researcher, Research Centre “Dostoevsky and World Culture,” А.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Povarskaya St., 25A, bld. 1, 121069 Moscow, Russia.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7521-1898

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
For citation:

Magaril-Il’iaeva, T.G. “The Hero’s Journey in Dostoevsky’s Early Works and Crime and Punishment.” Dostoevsky and World Culture. Philological journal, no. 1 (25), 2024, pp. 45–61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2024-1-45-61
Received: 08 Mar. 2024
Published: 25 Mar. 2024
Issue: 2024 no. 1 (25)
Department: HERMENEUTICS. SLOW READING
Pages: 45-61
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2024-1-45-61
EDN:

https://elibrary.ru/TVLYZK
UDK: 821.161.1.0
BBK: 83.3(2=411.2)
Keywords: Fyodor Dostoevsky, Crime and Punishment, Dostoevsky’s early work, the motif of the sun, solitude, hard labor.
Abstract: The article proposes to consider how the early work of Fyodor Dostoevsky and the novel Crime and Punishment correlate at the level of their internal symbolic stories created by the author behind the external plots of the works. In this work, the hypothesis is put forward that Raskolnikov manages to follow the path of spiritual transformation, which the writer sought to find for his heroes of the 1840s, but then he failed to fully realize it. Despite the ongoing debate in the academic community about the role of the epilogue in Crime and Punishment, it can still be said that this novel, the only one from the Five Great Novels, shows the hero’s path from a complete fall to a directly prescribed spiritual resurrection. The article attempts to show that Raskolnikov follows the path along the “trajectory” described in the early texts, but obviously with some fundamental changes that allowed this path to be realized. The article is a description of the first steps in the development of this topic.

References

1. Bogdanova, O.A., and G.A. Vodopianova. “Evoliutsiia obraza mechtatelia v rannem tvorchestve F.M. Dostoevskogo” [“The Evolution of the Image of the Dreamer in Dostoevsky’s Early Works”]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta, no. 3–5 (23), 2001, pp. 91–93. (In Russ.)

2. Grossman, L.P. “Put’ Dostoevskogo” [“Dostoevsky’s Path”]. Tvorchestvo Dostoevskogo 1821–1881–1921 [Dostoevsky’s Work. 1821–1881–1921]. Odessa, Vseukr. gos. izd-vo Publ., 1921, pp. 83–108. (In Russ.)

3. Grossman, L.P. Dostoevskii [Dostoevsky]. 2nd Edition, rev. and edd. Moscow, Molodaia gvardiia Publ., 1965. 608 p. (In Russ.)

4. F.M. Dostoevskii v vospominaniiakh sovremennikov [Fyodor Dostoevsky in the Memoirs of the Contemporaries], vol. 2. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaia literatura Publ., 1990. 623 p. (In Russ.)

5. Dostoevskii, F.M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 30 tomakh [Complete Works: in 30 vols]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1972–1990. (In Russ.)

6. Durylin, S.N. “Ob odnom simvole u Dostoevskogo. Opyt tematicheskogo obzora” [“About One Symbol in Dostoevsky: An Experiment of Thematic Review”]. Dostoevskii: Trudy Gosudarstvennoi Akademii Khudozhestvennykh nauk. Literaturnaia sektsiia [Dostoevsky: Proceedings of the State Academy of Arts. Literature Section], issue 3. Moscow, GAKhN Publ., 1928, pp. 163–199. (In Russ.)

7. Zhiliakova, E.M. Traditsii sentimentalizma v tvorchestve rannego Dostoevskogo (1844–1849) [Sentimentalism Traditions in the Early Works of Dostoevsky (1844–1849)]. Tomsk, Izd-vo Tomskogo un-ta Publ., 1989. 271 p. (In Russ.)

8. Kasatkina, T.A. Sviashchennoe v povsednevnom. Dvusostavnyi obraz v proizvedeniiakh F.M. Dostoevskogo [The Sacred in the Ordinary: The Two-Folded Image in Dostoevsky’s Works]. Moscow, IWL RAS Publ., 2015. 523 р. (In Russ.)

9. Kosiakov, S.A. Mechtatel’ i ego transformatsii v tvorchestve F.M. Dostoevskogo [The Dreamer and His Transformations in Dostoevsky’s Work: PhD Dissertation]. Voronezh, 2009. 155 p. (In Russ.)

10. Magaril-Il’iaeva, T.G. “Feletony 1847 goda kak ‘tolkovyi slovar’’ filosofii rannego tvorchestva F.M. Dostoevskogo” [“1847 Feuilletons as an ‘Explanatory Dictionary’ of the Philosophy of Dostoevsky’s Early Works”]. Dostoevskii i mirovaia kul’tura. Filologicheskii zhurnal, no. 4 (16), 2021, pp. 24–39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2021-4-24-41

11. Medvedeva, D.A., and A.A. Kazakov. “Mechtateli i ideologi v mire F.M. Dostoevskogo v svete fenomenologii bezumiia” [“Dreamers and Ideologist in Dostoevsky’s Work in the Light of a Phenomenology of Craziness”]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiia, no. 4 (36), 2015, pp. 141–150. (In Russ.)

12. Medvedev, A.A. “Simvolika kosykh luchei v tvorchestve F.M. Dostoevskogo i pravoslavnaia liturgicheskaia i bogoslovskaia traditsiia” [“Symbolism of Oblique Rays in the Works of Fyodor Dostoevsky and the Orthodox Liturgical and Theological Tradition”]. Kontekst-2008: Istoriko-literaturnye i teoreticheskie issledovaniia [Context 2008: Historical-Literary and Theoretical Research]. Moscow, IWL RAS Publ., 2009, pp. 18–46. (In Russ.)

13. Meletinskii, E.M. O literaturnykh arkhetipakh [On Literary Archetypes]. Moscow, Kul’turnaia initsiativa Publ., 1994. 136 p. (In Russ.)

14. Nechaeva, V.S. Rannii Dostoevskii. 1821–1849 [Early Dostoevsky. 1821–1849]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1979. 288 p. (In Russ.)

15. Fedorova, E.A., and V.V. Liubarets. “Mechtatel’ i Podpol’nyi geroi M.Iu. Lermontova i F.M. Dostoevskogo v svete eticheskogo ucheniia A.A. Ukhtomskogo” [“The Dreamer and the Underground Man of Mikhail Lermontov and Fyodor Dostoevsky in the Light of A.A. Ukhtomsky’s Ethical Doctrine”]. Dva veka russkoi klassiki, vol. 5, no. 2, 2023, pp. 50–71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22455/2686-7494-2023-5-2-50-71