Download:

PDF

Author: Olga Yu. Yuryeva
Information about the author:

DSc in Philology, Head of the Department of Philology and Methodology, Pedagogical Institute, Federal State-Founded Educational Institution of Higher Education “Irkutsk State University,” Sukhe-Batora 9, 664003 Irkutsk, Russia.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8424-4202

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

For citation:

Yuryeva, O.Yu. “The Title of Crime and Punishment as a Key to a Holistic Analysis of Dostoevsky’s Novel at School. Article 1: Crime.” Dostoevsky and World Culture. Philological journal, no. 1 (25), 2024, pp. 168–197. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2024-1-168-197

Received: 15 Jan. 2024
Published: 25 Mar. 2024
Issue: 2024 no. 1 (25)
Department: TEACHING DOSTOEVSKY
Pages: 168-197
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2024-1-168-197
EDN:

https://elibrary.ru/YDETNP

UDK: 882(092):81'37
BBK: 83.3Р1
Keywords: Fyodor Dostoevsky, Crime and Punishment, semantics of the title, religious and philosophical meaning of the concepts of “crime” and “punishment,” Razumikhin’s image, motives of Raskolnikov’s crime.
Abstract: The article is intended for teachers of literature and can help organize a conversation about the novel Crime and Punishment. It offers a variant of a modern reading of one of the most significant works of the school curriculum and summarizes the views of leading Dostoevsky’s scholars on the key problems of the novel, offering topical interpretations of its fundamental images and collisions. A new interpretation of Razumikhin’s image as a true “Russian personality” and the embodiment of the “brotherhood” that will save Raskolnikov is proposed here. The analysis of the multidimensional semantics of the concepts of “crime” and “punishment” included in the title allows the teacher to present a holistic analysis of the novel, organize a conversation about the key images and problems raised in it, help students grasp the depth and significance of the issues that can be “dug out” of it. Answering the questions proposed in the article and completing assignments, the students come to the conclusion that the true crime in the novel is represented by the idea, and the murder of an old woman is the result of its influence. Such concepts as “false” and “true” motives of crime, universal and actual concept of “algorithm of crime” are introduced into the methodology of school analysis of the novel, “dialectics” of a “ideologic crime” is shown. The article proposes a system of questions and tasks that can contribute to a deeper understanding of the great novel by students.

References

1. Bakhtin, M.M. Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo [Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics]. Moscow, Sov. Rossiia Publ., 1979. 318 p. (In Russ.)

2. Borisova, V.V. “‘Brat’ia i sestry’ v romane F.M. Dostoevskogo ‘Prestuplenie i nakazanie’: poetika obrazov” [“‘Brothers and Sisters’ in Dostoevsky’s Novel Crime and Punishment: The Poetics of the Images”]. Borisova, V.V. Aktualnyi Dostoevskii: teksty i konteksty [Relevant Dostoevsky: Texts and Contexts]. Ufa, ArtPrint Publ., 2021, pp. 103–109. (In Russ.)

3. Vetlovskaia, V.E. “Logicheskoe oproverzhenie protivnika v ‘Prestuplenii i nakazanii’ Dostoevskogo” [“The Logical Refutation of the Opponent in Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment”]. Dostoevskii. Materialy i issledovaniia [Dostoevsky. Materials and Research], vol. 13. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 1996, pp. 74–87. (In Russ.)

4. Viktorovich, V.A. “‘Byli by brat’ya…’: M.M. Dostoevskii kak prototip Razumikhina” [“‘If There Were Brothers...’: Mikhail Dostoevsky as Razumikhin’s Prototype”]. Dostoevskii. Materialy i issledovaniia [Dostoevsky. Materials and Research], vol. 22. St. Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriia Publ., 2019, pp. 41–55. (In Russ.)

5. Viktorovich, V.A. “‘Prestuplenie i nakazanie’ kak roman soznaniia” [“Crime and Punishment as a Novel of Consciousness”]. Dostoevskii i mirovaia kul’tura. Filologicheskii zhurnal, no. 3 (23), 2023, pp. 28–42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2023-3-28-42

6. Dostoevskii, F.M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 30 tomakh [Complete Works: in 30 vols]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1972−1990. (In Russ.)

7. Zakharov, V.N. “‘Pravoslavnoe vozzrenie’: idei i ideal” [“‘Orthodox View’: Ideas and Ideal”]. Dostoevskii, F.M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: Kanonicheskie teksty [Complete Works: Canonic Texts], vol. 7. Ed. by V.N. Zakharov. Petrozavodsk, PetrGU Publ., 2007, pp. 529–544. (In Russ.)

8. Kariakin, Iu. Samoobman Raskol’nikova (Roman F.M. Dostoevskogo “Prestuplenie i nakazanie”) [Raskolnikov’s Self-Deception (Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Novel Crime and Punishment)]. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaia literatura Publ., 1976. 158 p. (In Russ.)

9. Kasatkina, T.A. “Avtorskie strategii sozdaniia glubokogo teksta v romane F.M. Dostoevskogo ‘Prestuplenie i nakazanie’” [“The Author’s Strategies for Creating a Deep Text in Dostoevsky’s Novel Crime and Punishment”]. Nasledie Dostoevskogo v natsional’nykh kul’turakh [Dostoevsky’s Heritage in National Cultures]. Kars, 2022, pp. 1–14. (In Russ.)

10. Kasatkina, T.A. “Mezhdu Bogom i…. teorei?” [“Between God and... Theory?”]. Dostoevskii, F.M. Sobranie sochinenii: v 9 tomakh [Collected Works: in 9 vols], vol. 3: Prestuplenie i nakazanie [Crime and Punishment]. Moscow, Astrel’ Publ., 2004, pp. 98–119. (In Russ.)

11. Merezhkovskii, D.S. “Dostoevskii” [“Dostoevsky”]. Merezhkovskii, D.S. Akropol’. Izbrannye literaturno-kriticheskie stat’i [Acropolis. Selected Articles of Literary Criticism]. Moscow, Knizhnaia palata Publ., 1991, pp. 108–126. (In Russ.)

12. Mysliakov, V.A. “Kak rasskazana ‘istoriia’ Rodiona Raskol’nikova (K voprosu o sub’’ektivno-avtorskom nachale u Dostoevskogo)” [“How Rodion Raskolnikov’s ‘Story’ Is Told (About the Question of Dostoevsky’s Subjective Authorial Principle)”]. Dostoevskii. Materialy i issledovaniia [Dostoevsky. Materials and Research], vol. 1. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1974, pp. 147–163. (In Russ.)

13. Podosokorskii, N.N. “‘Napoleonovskii’ Peterburg i ego otrazhenie v romane F.M. Dostoevskogo ‘Prestuplenie i nakazanie’” [“‘Napoleonic’ Petersburg and its Reflection in Dostoevsky’s Novel Crime and Punishment”]. Dostoevskii i mirovaia kul’tura. Filologicheskii zhurnal, no. 4 (20), 2022, pp. 71–135. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2022-4-71-135

14. Stepanian, K.A. Putevoditel’ po romanu F.M. Dostoevskogo “Prestuplenie i nakazanie”: Uchebnoe posobie [A Guide to Dostoevsky’s Novel Crime and Punishment: A Handbook]. Moscow, Izd.-vo Mosk. Un.-ta Publ., 2014. 208 p. (In Russ.)

15. Tikhomirov, B.N. “K voprosu o ‘prototipakh obraza idei’ v romanakh Dostoevskogo” [“On the Question of ‘Prototypes of the Image of an Idea’ in Dostoevsky’s Novels”]. Tikhomirov, B.N. “…Ia zanimaius’ etoi tainoi, ibo khochu byt’ chelovekom”: Stat’i i esse o Dostoevskom [“… I Am Studying This Mystery, Because I Want to Be a Man”: Articles and Essays on Dostoevsky]. St. Petersburg, Serebrianyi vek Publ., 2012, pp. 311–326. (In Russ.)

16. Tikhomirov, B.N. “K osmysleniiu glubinnoi perspektivy romana F.M. Dostoevskogo ‘Prestuplenie i nakazanie’” [“For an Understanding of the Deep Perspective of Dostoevsky’s Novel Crime and Punishment”]. Stepanian, K.A., editor. Dostoevskii v kontse XX veka. Sbornik statei [Dostoevsky at the End of the 20th Century. Collected Articles]. Moscow, Klassika plius Publ., 1996, pp. 252–269. (In Russ.)

17. Tikhomirov, B.N. “‘Pereryt’ vse voprosy v etom romane…’” [“‘Dig Through All the Questions in This Novel…’”]. Dostoevskii, F.M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: Kanonicheskie teksty [Complete Works: Canonic Texts], vol. 7. Ed. by V.N. Zakharov. Petrozavodsk, PetrGU Publ., 2007, pp. 545–574. (In Russ.)

18. Tikhomirov, B.N. “Roman o prestuplenii, nakazanii i voskresenii Rodiona Raskol’nikova” [“A Novel About the Crime, Punishment, and Resurrection of Rodion Raskolnikov”]. Tikhomirov, B.N. “Lazar’! Griadi von”. Roman F.M. Dostoevskogo “Prestuplenie i nakazanie” v sovremennom prochtenii. Kniga-kommentarii [“Lazarus, Come Out.” A Contemporary Reading of Dostoevsky’s Novel Crime and Punishment. Book-Commentary]. St. Petersburg, Serebriannyi vek Publ., 2005, pp. 7–47. (In Russ.)

19. Iureva, O.Iu. “Zachem v romane Vrazumikhin?” [“Why is Vrazumikhin in the Novel?”]. Sharakov, S.L., editor. Dostoevskii i sovremennost’. Materialy XXXVI Mezhdunarodnykh Starorusskikh chtenii 2021 goda [Dostoevsky and Contemporary Age. Proceedings of the 36th International Readings in Staraya Russa, 2021]. Veliky Novgorod, 2022, pp. 118–128. (In Russ.)