Defending Dostoevsky: The History of Dvosya Sorkina’s 1956 Dissertation

JATS XML:

XML

BibTEX:

BIB

Research Information Systems Citation Format:

RIS

Download:

PDF

Author: Petr A. Druzhinin

Information about the author:

PhD in History, Senior Research Fellow, Vinogradov Institute of Russian Language of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Volkonka St., 18/2, 119019 Moscow, Russia.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3097-3375

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

For citation:

Druzhinin, P.A. “Defending Dostoevsky: The History of Dvosya Sorkina’s 1956 Dissertation.” Dostoevsky and World Culture. Philological journal, no. 1 (29), 2025, pp. 266–289. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2025-1-266-289

Received: 09 Jan. 2025

Approved after reviewing: 26 Jan. 2025

Published: 25 Mar. 2025

Issue: 2025 no. 1 (29)

Department: DOSTOEVSKY IN THE 20TH AND 21ST CENTURIES

Pages: 266-289

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2025-1-266-289

EDN:

https://elibrary.ru/VPODZW

UDK: 821.161.1.0

BBK: 83.3(2Рос=Рус)

Publication Type: Research Article

Keywords: Dostoevsky, Sorkina, Dolinin, dissertation, Higher Attestation Commission of Russia, Stalinism, cosmopolitanism, thaw.

Abstract: The article reconstructs the history of Dvosia Lvovna Sorkina’s (1922–2011) dissertation, Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Novel The Idiot and the Socio-Literary Struggle of the 1860s. The dissertation was defended at Leningrad University in 1956. The article is based on archival and published sources, including previously unpublished letters from Dvosya Sorkina to her academic advisor, prof. Arkady Dolinin, a prominent researcher of Dostoevsky. Sorkina started her research in the mid-1940s, but the ideology of late Stalinism was markedly unfriendly to the study of the great Russian writer. The ideological campaign launched in 1947 against Dostoevsky’s legacy significantly hampered progress of the dissertation. Increasing ideological pressure on philological scholarship over the years resulted in even official opponents (Grigory Byaly and Alexander Dementyev) seeking to distance themselves from the dangerous topic, thereby complicating the submission of the dissertation for defense. In 1950, a fateful event for Dostoevsky studies occurred: the publication of Lenin’s letter to Inessa Armand, sharply criticizing the great Russian writer. Since Lenin’s views were treated as tantamount to a party directive, after 1950, the communist press frequently cited this letter to discredit Dostoevsky’s legacy. As a result, Dostoevsky’s name was removed from university curricula, his works ceased to be published, and Dostoevsky studies were effectively banned outright. It was only after Stalin’s death that Dostoevsky was rehabilitated, allowing Dvosya Sorkina, during the thaw of the Khrushchev era, to resume her work. In 1956, she successfully defended her dissertation and later became a renowned scholar in Dostoevsky’s tudies.

References

1. Azadovskii, K.M., and P.A. Druzhinin. “Stalinskaia Rilkeana: Istoriia odnoi dissertatsii” [“Stalin’s Rilkeana: The History of One Dissertation”]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, no. 5 (129), 2014, p. 122–172. (In Russ.)

2. Galushkin, I.A., and M.A. Frolov, eds. “V sluzhenii odnomu delu...”: “Literaturnoe nasledstvo” v vospominaniiakh i perepiske I.S. Zil’bershteina i S.A. Makashina” [“In Service to One Matter...”: “Literary Heritage” in the Memoirs and Correspondence of Ilya Silberstein and Sergey Makashin]. Moscow, IWL RAS Publ., 2022. 544 p. (In Russ.)

3. Gural’nik, U.A. Bor’ba “Sovremennika” s zhurnalami Dostoevskogo: Iz literaturnoi polemiki 60-kh gg. [The Struggle of “Sovremennik” with Dostoevsky’s Journals: From the Literary Polemics of the 1960s: PhD Summary]. Moscow, 1949. 20 p. (In Russ.)

4. Kirikova, N.N., editor. Dissertatsii, zashchishchennye v Leningradskom Ordena Lenina Gosudarstvennom universitete imeni A.A. Zhdanova v 1956–1958 gg.: (Bibliograficheskii ukazatel’) [Dissertations defended at the A.A. Zhdanov Leningrad Order of Lenin State University in 1956-1958: (Bibliographic Index)]. Leningrad, Izd-vo Leningradskogo un-ta Publ., 1960. 68 p. (In Russ.)

5. Druzhinin, P.A. Ideologiia i filologiia, Leningrad, 1940-e gody: Dokumental’noe issledovanie: v 2 tomakh [Ideology and Philology, Leningrad, 1940s: A Documental Research: in 2 vols]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2012. (In Russ.)

6. Kazakov, A.A., and E.G. Novikova. “Istoriia izucheniia tvorchestva F.M. Dostoevskogo v Tomskom gosudarstvennom universitete” [“The History of Dostoevsky’s Studies at Tomsk State University”]. Dostoevskii i vremia: sbornik statei [Dostoevsky and the Time: Collected Articles]. Tomsk, Izd-vo Tomskogo un-ta Publ., 2004, pp. 5–8. (In Russ.)

7. Kiseleva, I.V. Poklon Tomsku [A Bow to Tomsk]. Tomsk, Krasnoe znamia Publ., 2019. 204 p. (In Russ.)

8. Leites, A. “Antinauchnye izmyshleniia pod vidom dissertatsii” [“Anti-Scientific Fabrications Disguised as Dissertation”]. Literaturnaia gazeta, no. 83, 1949, 15 Oct. (In Russ.)

9. Lenin, V.I. Sochineniia: v 35 tomakh [Works: in 35 vols], vol. 35. Moscow, Gospolitizdat Publ., 1950. IX, 526 p. (In Russ.)

10. Modzalevskaia, T.L. “Filologi — uchitelia i ucheniki shkoly K. Maia: prepodavateli literatury i russkogo iazyka gimnazii i real’nogo uchilishcha K. Maia i ee sovetskikh shkol-preemnits” [“Philologists: Teachers and Students of the K. May School: Teachers of Literature and Russian Language of the K. May Gymnasium and Real School and its Soviet Successor Schools”]. Blagovo, N.V., editor. Na sluzhbe Otechestvu: sud’by i dostizheniia pedagogov i vospitannikov peterburgskoi shkoly, osnovannoi v 1856 g., izvestnoi kak Gimnaziia i Real’noe uchilishche K. Maia: Sbornik statei [In the Service of the Fatherland: Fates and Achievements of Teachers and Pupils of the St. Petersburg School, Founded in 1856, Known as the Gymnasium and Real School of K. May: Collected Articles]. St. Petersburg, Izd. SPb gos. Muzeia-instituta sem’i Rerikhov Publ., 2023, pp. 124–127. (In Russ.)

11. Podosokorskii, N.N. “‘Reabilitatsiia’ F.M. Dostoevskogo v period ottepeli” [“The ‘Rehabilitation’ of Fyodor Dostoevsky during the Thaw”]. Novyi mir, no. 8, 2024, p. 162–176. (In Russ.)

12. Riurikov, B. “Pis’ma Lenina [Rets. na kn.: Lenin V.I. Sochineniia, t. 35, 35. Izdanie 4-e]” [“Lenin’s Letters. Review to: Lenin, V.I. Works. Vol. 35. 4th Edition”]. Literaturnaia gazeta, no. 31, 1951, 15 March, pp. 2–3. (In Russ.)

13. Sorokina, D.L. Roman F.M. Dostoevskogo “Idiot” i obshchestvenno-literaturnaia bor’ba 1860-kh godov [Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Novel The Idiot and the Socio-Literary Struggle of the 1860s: PhD Summary]. Leningrad, 1956. 20 p. (In Russ.)

14. Sorokina, D.L. Dostoevskii v shkole [Dostoevsky at School]. Tomsk, Tomskii obl. Institute usovershenstvovaniia uchitelei Publ., 1969. 101 p. (In Russ.)

15. Khan, H. Rashid. “Doctoral Dissertations in the United States, Canada and the Former Soviet Union on Fedor Dostoevsky, 1921–1996.” Russian Language Journal = Русский язык = Études de russe, vol. 52, no. 171/173 (Winter-Spring-Fall 1998), [East Lansing (MI)], 1998, p. 307–338. (In English)