- Download:
PDF
- Author:
Boris N. Tikhomirov
- Information about the author:
DSc in Philology, Deputy Research Director of F.M. Dostoevsky Literary-Memorial Museum, St. Petersburg.
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
- For citation:
Tikhomirov B. N. The Evangelical Stratum in the Architectonics of Dostoevsky’s Short Story “A Nasty Story” // Dostoevsky and World Culture. 2018. No 4. Pp. 65–77.
- Issue:
2018 no. 4
- Department:
POETICS. CONTEXT
- Pages:
65-77
- DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2018-4-65-77
- UDK:
82.09
- BBK:
83.3 (2РОС=РУС)
- Keywords:
Dostoevsky, “A Nasty Story”, poetics, architectonics, intertextuality, allusions, New Testament.
- Abstract:
: Dostoevsky’s “A Nasty Story” is examined as a landmark piece of work in the evolution of Dostoevsky’s creative system. The author focuses his attention on the system of Biblical intertexts in the artistic structure of the story, a system that plays the peculiar role both in organizing the creative cohesion of the short story and in embodying Dostoevsky’s position. In the anecdotal situation of the liberalminded general Pralinsky’s visit to his subordinate Pseldonimov’s marriage feast, Dostoevsky travesties the Evangelical episode of the marriage in Cana of Galilee, and organizes the plot as a farcical realization of Christ’s parable about new wine and old/new wineskins. The narrator pretending to become an apostle of a “humanism” that, in his mind, “will save everything” and lead to the “renewal of things”, by means of a system of New Testament intertextual references is correlated parodically to Apostles, to John the Baptist, and even to the Savior. As a result we can see, by contrast, that general Pralinsky’s means are pitifully unfit for the role he is claiming, and that the tasks he is setting to can be completed only by Christian (and not liberal) ways.
References
1. Blazhennogo Evseviia Ieronima, presvitera Stridonskogo chetyre knigi tolkovanii na Evangelie ot Matfeia [Of the Blessed Eusebius Hieronymus, Presbyter of Stridon, Four Books of Commentaries on Matthew]. Moscow, Uchebno-informatsionnyi ekumenicheskii tsentr ap. Pavla Publ., 1998. 272 p. (In Russ.)
2. Dostoevskii F. M. Poln. sobr. soch.: V 30 t. [Complete Works in 30 vols.]. Leningrad. Nauka Publ., 1972–1990. (In Russ.)
3. Dostoevskii F. M. Poln. sobr. soch. i pisem: V 35 t. [Complete Works in 35 vols.] St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2013–2016. (In Russ.)
4. Dostoevskii F. M. Poln. sobr. soch.: Kanonicheskie teksty [Complete Works. Canonical Texts]. Petrozavodsk, Izd. PetrGU Publ., 1995–2016. T. 1–9 add., 11 (continuing edition)
5. Dostoevskii F. M. Malaia proza: V 2 t. [Small Proze: in 2 vols.], ed., introduction and comm. by B.N. Tikhomirov. St. Petersburg, Vita Nova Publ., 2018. Vol. 2 (in printing). (In Russ.)
6. Zhivolupova N. V. Transformatsiia motiva “podrazhaniia Khristu” v proizvedeniiakh F. M. Dostoevskogo 60-kh godov (“Skvernyi anekdot”, “Zapiski iz podpol'ia”, “Krokodil”) [Transformation of the Motive of “Imitating Christ” in F.M. Dostoevsky’s Works of the 1860s (“A Nasty Story”, “Notes from the Underground”, “Crocodile”)]. Dostoevskii i sovremennost’: Materialy VIII Mezhdunarodnykh Starorusskikh chtenii [Dostoevsky and Modernity: Materials of the VIII International Readings in Staraya Russa]. Novgorod, 1994. Pp. 121-130. (In Russ.)
7. Leibov R. Zametki o “Skvernom anecdote” [Notes about the “A Nasty Story”]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [New Literary Bulletin]. 1994. № 8. Pp. 158-173. (In Russ.)
