F. M. Dostoevsky's Novel "The Idiot": History and Typology of Commentary

Download:

PDF
Author: Valentina V. Borisova
Information about the author:

DSc in Philology, Professor, Head of the Department of Russian Literature, of M. Akmullah Bashkir State Pedagogical University, Ufa.

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
For citation:

Borisova V.V. F.M. Dostoevsky’s Novel “The Idiot”: Conception History and Typology // Dostoevsky and World Culture. 2018. No 4. Pp. 194–200.
Issue: 2018 no. 4
Department: DOSTOEVSKY: CURRENT STATE OF RESEARCH
Pages: 194-200
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2018-4-194-200
UDK: 821.161.1
BBK: 83.3(2=411.2)
Keywords: F.M. Dostoevsky, “Idiot”, comments, apology and demythologization of Myshkin's image, receptive conflict, H. Holbein picture.
Abstract: The article reviews the history and conception typology of the novel by F.M. Dostoevsky called “Idiot” in XX century. The pluralism in understanding of purposes and objectives of its commenting which appeared between two centuries is stated, as a result the text comments and interpretation of its conception are mixed together. There is also a sharp polarization of alternative interpretations of this piece of work in the modern literature studies: the novel and its character are deemed on pro et contra principle. Hereof the simultaneous expression of Christian apology and demythologization of Myshkin's image which is caused by the receptive conflict in relation to him that is suddenly appeared in 1990 when the “inspection” of “Idiot” novel and the polemic around its principal character began. Polar opposite assessments of H. Holbein picture so ecphrasically described by Dostoevsky are considered as a stunning example of receptive and axiological conflict.

References

1. Borisova V., Schaulov S. Receptive conflict of the novel “The Idiot” by F.M. Dostoevsky in the context of the novel “The Brothers Karamazov” // European journal of science and theology. 2015. Т. 11. № 4. Pp. 23-28.

2. Dostoevskij F.M. Idiot [The Idiot]. Poln. sobr. soch. v 30 tt [Complete Works in 30 vols.]. Vol. 8. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1973. (In Russ.)

3. Kasatkina T.A. Rol hudozhestvennoj detali i osobennosti funkcionirovaniya slova v romane F. M. Dostoevskogo «Idiot» [The Role of the Artistic Image and the Peculiarities of Functioning of the Word in F.M. Dostoevsky’s Novel “The Idiot”]. Roman F. M. Dostoevskogo «Idiot»: sovremennoe sostoyanie izucheniya. Sb. rabot otechestvennyh i zarubezhnyh uchenyh [F.M. Dostoyevsky’s Novel “The Idiot”: Modern State of Studying. Collection of Russian and Foreign Researchers’ Works]. Moscow, Nasledie Publ., 2001. Pp. 60-100. (In Russ.)

4. Kasatkina Tatyana. Svyashennoe v povsednevnom: dvusostavnyj obraz v proizvedeniyah F.M. Dostoevskogo [Sacral in Mundane: Binominal Image in F.M. Dostoevsky’s Works]. Moscow, IMLI RAN Publ., 2015. 528 p. (In Russ.)

5. Kirillova I. A. Obraz Hrista v tvorchestve Dostoevskogo. Razmyshleniya [The Image of Christ in Dostoevsky’s Works. Reflections]. Moscow, Tsentr knigi Vseros. gos. biblioteki inostrannoi lit-ry im. M.I. Rudomino Publ., 2010. 153 p. (In Russ.)

6. Kommentarij: blesk i nisheta zhanra v sovremennuyu epohu (2004). (Stenogramma «kruglogo stola» v ramkah XI Lotmanovskih chtenij. Moskva, RGGU, 20 dekabrya 2003 g.) [Splendor and Misery of the Genre in the Modern Age (2004). Verbatim report of the “round table” discussion during the 11th Lotman Reading in Moscow, RGGU, 20 Dec 2003]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [New Literary Survey]. 2004, № 2 (66). Pp. 103-121. (In Russ.)

7. Tvoreniya Svyatogo otca nashego Ioanna Zlatousta arhiepiskopa Konstantinopolskogo. Tolkovanie na psalmy. Tom pyatyj, kniga pervaya [Works of Our Hole Father John Chrysostom, the Archbishop of Constantinople. Commentary on Psalms. Vol. 5, Book 1]. Ulyanovsk, Zolotoj korabl’ Publ., 2012. 1005 p. [Electronic resource]. – Available at: https://lib.pravmir.ru/library/readbook/1070#part_7697

8. Stepanyan K.A. Dostoevskij i Servantes: dialog v bol’shom vremeni [Dostoevsky and Cervantes: A Dialogue in Greater Time]. Moscow, YAzyki slavyanskoj kul'tury, 2013. 368 p. (In Russ.)

9. Zaharov V.N. Voskres li mertvyj Hristos? [Did Christ Arise from the Dead?] Imya avtora – Dostoevskij. Ocherk tvorchestva [The Author’s Name is Dostoevsky. An Outline of Work]. Moscow, Izd-vo “Indrik” Publ., 2013. Pp. 272-300. (In Russ.)

10. Zhilyakova E. M. Poetika “nevyrazimogo” v romane “Idiot”: F. M. Dostoevskij i V. A. Zhukovskij [Poetics of the Inexpressible in the Novel “The Idiot”: F.M. Dostoevsky and V.A. Zhukovsky]. Roman Dostoevskogo "Idiot": Razdumya. Problemy. Mezhvuzovskij sbornik nauchnyh trudov [Dostoevsky’s Novel “The Idiot”: Reflections. Problems. International Collection of Research Papers]. Ivanovo, IvGu Publ., 1999. Pp. 47-59. (In Russ.)