From a Rhetoric of tapeinosis and humilitas through the Tradition of Holy Fools to Dostoevsky’s Christopoetics (The Idiot)

Download:

PDF
Author: Dirk Uffelmann
Information about the author:

Professor, Head of the Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures, Justus Liebig University Giessen, OttoBehaghel-Str. 10 D, D-35394 Gießen, Germany.

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
For citation:

Uffelmann, Dirk. “From a Rhetoric of tapeinosis and humilitas through the Tradition of Holy Fools to Dostoevsky’s Christopoetics (The Idiot).” Dostoevsky and World Culture. Philological journal, no. 1 (17), 2022, pp. 100–122. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2022-1-100-122 
Received: 15 Nov. 2021
Published: 25 Mar. 2022
Issue: 2022 no. 1 (17)
Department: POETICS. CONTEXT
Pages: 100-122
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2022-1-100-122
UDK: 821.161.1.0
BBK: 83.3(2=411.2)5 + 86.372.24-4
Keywords: Dostoevsky, The Idiot, Myshkin, Christ, John Chrysostom, holy fools, rhetoric, practice, self-humiliation, tapeinosis.
Abstract: The Christological hymn included in Apostle Paul’s Epistle to the Philippians (2,5-11) applies two different Greek verbs in connection to the concept of Christ’s self-humiliation: kenosis and tapeinosis. This article traces the interconnections between the ethical norm of positive self-humiliation (kenosis) and the rhetorical practice of abasement (tapeinosis). The latter used to be considered as something undesirable throughout most of the history of rhetoric, while it was rendered functional by the imitators of Christ. This fact gave rise to a thread ranging from Greek fathers (John Chrysostom, Theodoret of Cyrrhus) to Johann Georg Hamann and Karlfried Gründer, who argue for a positive understanding of rhetorical humility as well. Drawing on this conceptual tradition, the author zooms in on the poor appearance and humble speech of Russian holy fools which inspired the communicative behavior of the Christlike character of Count Myshkin as imagined in Fedor M. Dostoevsky’s novel The Idiot (1867-1869). In contrast to merely negative interpretations of Myshkin’s defeat in the plot of the novel, for example by Walter Benjamin, the author demonstrates that it is exactly his communicative deficits and clumsiness which render Myshkin a convincing imitator of Christ—through his ethical humility and oral defensiveness, which make Myshkin’s failure comparable to Christ’s passion and crucifixion.

References

1. Grois, Boris. Pod podozreniem. Fenomenologiia media [Under Suspicion: A Phenomenology of Media]. Trans. by Andrey Fomenko. Moscow, Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal Publ., 2006. 200 p. (In Russ.)

2. Dostoevskii, F.M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 30 tomakh [Complete Works: in 30 vols]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1972–1990. (In Russ.)

3. Dmitriev, L.A., and Likhachev, D.S., eds. Izbornik. Sbornik proizvedenii literatury Drevnei Rusi [Izbornik: A Volume of Works from the Literature of Ancient Russia]. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaia literatura Publ., 1969. 800 p. (In Russ.)

4. Ioann (Zlatoust). Tvoreniia [Works]. Vol. 8. Book 1. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg Spiritual Academy Publ., 1902. 463 p. (In Russ.)

5. Ioann (Kologrivov). Ocherki po istorii russkoi sviatosti [A Sketch of the History of Russian Holiness]. Bruxelles, Zhizn’ s Bogom Publ., 1961. 419 p. (In Russ.)

6. Kvintilian, Markus Fabius. Ritoricheskie nastavleniia [Rhetorical Instructions]. Part 2. Book. 8. Trans. from Latin by A. Nikol’skii. Saint Petersburg, Imperial Russian Academy, 1834. 122 p. (In Russ.)

7. Kirillova, I.A. “Literaturnoe voploshchenie obraza Khrista” [“The Literary Embodiment of the Image of Christ”]. Voprosy literatury, no. 8, 1991, pp. 60–74. (In Russ.)

8. Lotman, Iu.M., Uspenskii, B.A. “Novye aspekty izucheniia kul’tury Drevnei Rusi” [“New Aspects of the Study of the Culture of Ancient Russia”]. Voprosy literatury, no. 3, 1977, pp. 148–166. (In Russ.)

9. Miuller, Ludolf. “Obraz Khrista v romane Dostoevskogo ‘Idiot’” [“The Image of Christ in Dostoevsky’s Novel The Idiot”]. Evangel’skii tekst v russkoi literature XVIII–XX vekov: tsitata, reministsentsiia, siuzhet, zhanr [The Gospel in Russian Literature in the 18th and 20th Centuries: Quotation, Reminiscence, Plot, Genre], issue 2, Petrozavodsk, Petrozavodsk University Publ., 1998, pp. 374–384. (In Russ.)

10. Panchenko, A.M. “Smekh kak zrelishche” [“Laughter as Show”]. Smekh v Drevnei Rusi [Laughter in Ancient Russia], ed. by D.S. Likhachev, A.M. Panchenko, N.V. Ponyrko, Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1984, pp. 72–153. (In Russ.)

11. Pryzhov, I.G. 26 moskovskikh prorokov, iurodivykh, dur i durakov i drugie trudy po russkoi istorii i etnografii [26 Muscovite Prophets, Holy Fools, Idiots, and Other Works on Russian History and Ethnography]. St. Petersburg-Moscow, Ezro i dr. Publ., 1996. 224 p. (In Russ.)

12. Fasmer, Mark. Etimologicheskii slovar’ russkogo iazyka: v 4 tomakh [Etymological Dictionary of Russian: in 4 vols]. Vol. 4. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1973. 855 p. (In Russ.)

13 Fedotov, G.P. Sviatye Drevnei Rusi [The Saints of Ancient Russia]. Moscow, Terra Publ., 1997. 220 p. (In Russ.)

14. Feodorit (Kirskii). Tvoreniia [Works]. Moscow, Palomnik, 2003. 720 p. (In Russ.)

15. Auerbach, Erich. Mimesis. Dargestellte Wirklichkeit in der abendländischen Literatur. Bern/München, Francke, 1946. 503 p. (In German)

16. Benjamin, Walter. “Der Idiot von Dostojewskij”. Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. II, 1, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1977, pp. 237–241. (In German)

17. Børtnes, Jostein. “Dostoevskian Fools — Holy and Unholy”. The Holy Fool in Byzantium and Russia, Lunde, Ingunn (ed.), Bergen, University of Bergen, 1995, pp. 18–34. (In English)

18. Børtnes, Jostein. “Dostoevskij’s ‘Idiot’ or the Poetics of Emptiness”. Scando-Slavica, no. 40, 1994, pp. 5–14. (In English)

19. Bullinger, Ethelbert W. Figures of Speech Used in the Bible. London, Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1898. 1104 p. (In English)

20. Chardin, Philippe. Un roman du clair-obscur. L’Idiot de Dostoïevski. Caen, Lettres Modernes Minard, 1976. 111 p. (In French)

21. Epstein, Mikhail. “Minimal Religion”. Russian Postmodernism: New Perspectives on PostSoviet Culture, Epstein, Mikhail, Genis, Alexander, Vladiv-Glover, Slobodanka (eds.), Oxford/ New York, Berghahn, 1999, pp. 163–171. (In English)

22. Fleischer, Susanne. Zur Rolle Christi und der Religion in Dostoevskijs Roman “Der Idiot”. Tübingen, Slavisches Seminar der Universität Tübingen, 2002. 33 p. (In German)

23. Gizewski, Christian. “Täuschung als Erfolgsprinzip öffentlicher Argumentation: ein praktisches Erbe antiker Rhetorik (1999)”. Tu-berlin.de, http://www.tu-berlin.de/fb1/AGiW/Scriptorium/S16.htm Accessed 31 Jan. 2022 (In German)

24. Gründer, Karlfried. Figur und Geschichte. Johann Georg Hamanns Biblische Betrachtungen als Ansatz einer Geschichtsphilosophie. Freiburg i. Br./München, Alber, 1958. 191 p. (In German)

25. Guardini, Romano. Religiöse Gestalten in Dostojewskijs Werk. Studien über den Glauben. Paderborn, Matthias-Grünewald Verlag, 1989. 316 p. (In German)

26. Hannick, Christian. “Hagiographie III. Orthodoxe Kirchen”. Theologische Realenzyklopädie. Berlin/New York, de Gruyter, Bd.14, 1985, pp. 371–377. (In German)

27. Hansen-Löve, Aage A. “Gøgøl. Zur Poetik der Null- und Leerstelle”. Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, no. 39, 1997, pp. 183–303. (In German)

28. Holquist, Michael. Dostoevsky and the Novel. Princeton (NJ), Princeton University Press, 1977. 202 p. (In English)

29. Jones, M. Dostoyevsky: The Novel of Discord. London, Elek, 1976. 236 p. (In English)

30. Lachmann, Renate. “Der Narr in Christo und seine Verstellungspraxis”. Unverwechselbarkeit. Persönliche Identität und Identifikation in der vormodernen Gesellschaft, von Moos, Peter (ed.), Köln et al., Böhlau, 2004, pp. 379–410. (In German)

31. Lachmann, Renate. Erzählte Phantastik. Zur Phantasiegeschichte und Semantik phantastischer Texte. Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2002. 501 p. (In German)

32. Lausberg, Heinrich. Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik. Eine Grundlegung der Literaturwissenschaft. Bd. 1. München, Hueber, 1973. 601 p. (In German)

33. Meyer, Holt. “Humilitas, minima modernitas”. Minimalismus. Zwischen Leere und Exzeß, Goller, Mirjam, Witte, Georg (eds.), Wien, Gesellschaft zur Förderung Slawistischer Studien, 2001, pp. 447–475. (In German)

34. Murav, Harriet. Holy Foolishness: Dostoevsky’s Novels: The Poetics of Cultural Critique. Stanford (CA), Stanford University Press, 1992. 213 p. (In English)

35. Nigg, Walter. Der christliche Narr. Zürich, Artemis, 1993. 410 p. (In German)

36. Onasch, Konrad. Der verschwiegene Christus. Versuch über die Poetisierung des Christentums in der Dichtung F.M. Dostojewskis. Berlin, Union, 1976. 241 p. (In German)

37. Ottovordemgentschenfelde, Natalia. Jurodstvo. Eine Studie zur Phänomenologie und Typologie des Narren in Christo. Frankfurt a.M., Lang, 2004. 336 p. (In German)

38. Puttenham, George. The Arte of English Poetry. London, Field, 1589. [8] 250 p. (In English)

39. Schultze, Brigitte. Der Dialog in F.M. Dostoevskijs „Idiot“. München, Sagner, 1974. 314 p. (In German)

40. Świderska, Małgorzata. “Der 'Idiot' — ein moderner Christus”. F.M. Dostojewski. Dichter, Denker, Visionär, Setzer, Heinz, Müller, Ludolf, Kluge, Rolf-Dieter (eds.), Tübingen, Attempto, 1998, pp. 111–135. (In German)

41. Thompson, Ewa. Understanding Russia: The Holy Fool in Russian Culture. Lanham (MD) et al., University Press of America, 1987. 229 p. (In English)

42. Uffelmann, Dirk. “Von der Rhetorik der tapeinosis bzw. humilitas über den Habitus des altrussischen Gottesnarren zu Dostoevskijs Christopoetik (‚Der Idiot‘)”. Rhetorik als kulturelle Praxis, Lachmann, Renate, Nicolosi, Riccardo, Strätling, Susanne (eds.), München, Fink 2008, pp. 151–163. (In German)

43. Uffelmann, Dirk. Der erniedrigte Christus. Metaphern und Metonymien in der russischen Kultur und Literatur. Köln et al., Böhlau, 2010. 1046 p. (In German)