Author: Jimmy Sudário Cabral
Information about the author:

PhD in Theology and Religious Studies, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro and University of Strasbourg, Professor of Religious Studies, Department of Religious Studies at Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Coordinator of the Laboratory of Studies of Religion in Dostoevsky and Tolstoy and his reception (NERDT), Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

For citation:

Cabral J.S. The gospel of Chernyshevsky: Nihilism, Art and Religious Asceticism. Dostoevsky and World Culture, 2019, No 2(6), pp. 242-269.

Issue: 2019 № 2(6)
Pages: 242-269
DOI: 10.22455/2619-0311-2019-2-242-269
UDK: 82+821.161.1+2-1
BBK: 83+83.3(2=411.2)+86.2
Keywords: Chernyshevsky, Art, Religion, Nihilism, Materialism, Christianity, Asceticism.

Abstract: The paper attempts to evaluate the philosophical and religious elements of Chernyshevsky’s book What is to Be Done. Taking into consideration a critical fortune that considered the book as a “new gospel”, the paper is divided into three parts. Firstly, we evaluate the religious trajectory of the young Chernyshevsky, his interpretation of Christianity, and the transformation of his religious convictions through his contact with Feuerbach’s philosophy. Secondly, the article analyzes the essay The Aesthetic Relations of Art with Reality, and Chernyshevsky’s redefinition of the concepts such as beautiful, tragic, and sublime, which will be at the base of his realism and of his materialist aesthetic. Lastly, the paper interprets What is to Be Done as a symptom of secularization of Christianity that translated the religious instinct of Chernyshevsky through a scientific and materialist Weltanschauung.



Badiou A. Manifesto for Philosophy. Albany, State University of New York Press, 1999. 181 p. (In Eng.)

Buchner L. Force and Matter or principles of the natural order of the universe. London, Asher and Co, 1884. (In Eng.)

Chernyshevsky N. Selected Philosophical Essays. Moscow, Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1953. 610 p. (In Eng.)

Chernyshevsky N. What is to be done? New York, Thomas Y. Crowell, 1886. 462 p. (In Eng.)

Chernyshevsky N.G. Chto delat’? [What Is to Be Done?]. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1969. Available at: (In Russ.)

Cohen M. The wager of Lucien Goldmann: tragedy, dialectics, and a hidden god. New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1994. 366 p. (In Eng.)

Dobrolyubov N. What is Oblomovism. Readings in Russian Civilization. Vol. II. Imperial Russia, 1700-1917. Edited with introductory notes by Thomas Riha. Second Edition Revised, The University of Chicago Press, 1969. Pp. 331-343. (In Eng.)

Domingues, Camilo J. T. Nikolai Gavrílovitch Tchernychévski e a intelligentsia russa: filosofia e ética na segunda metade do século XIX. Dissertação (Mestrado) – Universidade Federal Fluminense, ICH, Departamento de História, 2015. (In Port.)

Foucault M. Technologies of the Self. Lectures at University of Vermont Oct. 1982. Technologies of the Self. Amherst, Univ. of Massachusets Press, 1988. Pp. 16-49. (In Eng.)

Force, J.E., Popkin, R.H. Essays on the Context, Nature, and Influence of Isaac Newton’s Theology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990. 226 p. (In Eng.)

Frank J. Through the Russian Prism, Essays on Literature and Culture. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1990. 251 p. (In Eng.)

Gisbertz A. K. On Beauty and its Challenges: Friedrich Vischer and Karl Marx. Aesthetic Marx. Ed. By Samir Gandesha and Johan Hartle, Bloomsbury, 2017. 344 p. (In Eng.)

Goldmann L. Le Dieu cache. Paris, Gallimard, 1959. 454 p. (In French)

Hadot, 2002 – Hadot P. Exercices spirituels et philosophie antique. Éditions Albin Michel, 2002. 416 p.(In French)

Husserl E. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston, Northwestern University Press, 1970. 405 p. (In Eng.)

Leonard M. Tragic Modernities. Cambridge, Mass. and London, Harvard College, 2015. 204 p. (In Eng.)

Lossky N. History of Russian Philosophy. London, George Allen & Unwin, 1952. 416 p. (In Eng.)

Löwy M. Le pari communautaire de Lucien Goldmann. Recherche sociale, 1995, No 135, pp. 54-61. (In French)

Löwith K. From Hegel to Nietzsche: The Revolution in Nineteenth-Century Thought. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1964. 464 p. (In Eng.)

Lukács G. Introdução à Publicação Alemã de O que Fazer? de Tchernichévsky (1951). Artefilosofia, n. 22, Julho de 201, pp. 4-29. (In Port.)

Mathewson R. The Positive Hero in Russian Literature. Evanston, Northwestern University Press, 2000. 369 p. (In Eng.)

Nietzsche F. Untimely Meditations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007. 328 p. (In Eng.)

Nunes B. Introducao a filosofia da arte. Saõ Paulo, Ed. Ática, 1989. 126 p. (In Port.)

Papermo I. Tchernychevski et l’âge du réalisme. Essai de sémiotique des comportements. Lyon, Ens Éditions, 2017. 304 p. (In French)

Sovremennik, 1848 – Belinsky V.G. Vzgliad na russkuiu literaturu 1847 goda [A Review of Russian Literature in 1847]. Sovremennik, 1848, vol. VII, No 1, part III, pp. 1-39. (In Russ.)

Steiner G. La mort de la tragédie. Paris, Gallimard, 1993. 352 p. (In French)

The Essential Turgenev. Trans. by E. Allen. Evanston, Northwestern, 1994. 885 p. (In Eng.)

Venturi F. Roots of Revolution. A History of the Populist And Socialist Movements In Nineteenth Century Russia. New York, Alfred A. Knopf, 1960. 889 p. (In Eng.)

Walicki A. A History of Russian Thought: from the Enlightenment to Marxism. Redwood, Stanford University Press, 1979. 476 p. (In Eng.)

Zenkovsky V. Histoire de la Philosophie Russe: en 2 vols. Vol. I. Paris, Gallimard, 1953. 528 p. (In French)