Dostoevsky: Short Forms, the Principle of Complementarity, and the Jew Achilles. Who is the Hero of “The Crocodile,” and How Did Demons Begin? From the Editor

JATS XML:

BibTEX:

Research Information Systems Citation Format:

Download:
PDF
Author: Tatiana A. Kasatkina
Information about the author:
DSc in Philology, Director of Research, Head of the Research Centre “Dostoevsky and World Culture,” A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Povarskaya 25 a, 121069 Moscow, Russia.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0875-067X

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
For citation:
Kasatkina, T.A. “Dostoevsky: Short Forms, the Principle of Complementarity, and the Jew Achilles. Who is the Hero of “The Crocodile,” and How Did Demons Begin? From the Editor.” Dostoevsky and World Culture. Philological journal, no. 4 (28), 2024, pp. 10–30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2024-4-10-30
Published: 25 Dec. 2024
Issue: 2024 no. 4 (28)
Department: FROM THE EDITOR
Pages: 10-30
DOI: Visit Website
EDN:
https://elibrary.ru/KUVJRY

References

1. Borisova, V.V. Emblematika F.M. Dostoevskogo. Uchebnoe posobie [Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Emblematics. Textbook]. Ufa, 2012. 220 p. (In Russ.)

2. Dostoevskii, F.M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 30 tomakh [Complete Works: in 30 vols]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1972–1990. (In Russ.)

3. Kasatkina, T.A. O tvoriashchei prirode slova. Ontologichnost’ slova v tvorchestve F.M. Dostoevskogo kak osnova “realizma v vyschem smysle” [On the Poietic Nature the Word. The Ontology of the Word in the Work of F.M. Dostoevsky as the Fundament of “Realism in a Higher Sense”]. Moscow, IWL RAS Publ., 2004. 480 p.

4. Kasatkina, T.A. Dostoevskii kak filosof i bogoslov: khudozhestvennyi sposob vyskazyvaniia [Dostoevsky Philosopher and Theologian: the Artistic Way of Expression]. Moscow, Volodei Publ., 2019. 336 p. (In Russ.)

5. Kasatkina, T.A. “Dostoevskii — avtorskaia teoriia tvorchestva: ‘Zimnie zametki o letnikh vpechatleniiakh’” [“Dostoevsky: Authorial Theory of Art: Winter Notes on Summer Impressions”]. Saraskina, L.I., Tabachnikova, O.M., et al., eds. F.M. Dostoevskii v dialoge kul’tur: vzgliad iz XXI veka. K 200-letiiu F.M. Dostoevskogo. Monografiia [Fyodor Dostoevsky in the Dialogue of Cultures: A View from the 21st Century. To the 200th Anniversary of Fyodor Dostoevsky. Monograph]. Moscow, Gosudarstvennyi institute iskusstvoznaniia Publ., 2024, pp. 78–89. (In Russ.)

6. Saraskina, L.I. “Metafizika protivostoianiia v ‘Brat’iakh Karamazovy’” [“The Metaphysics of Opposition in The Brothers Karamazov”]. Kasatkina, T.A., editor. Roman F.M. Dostoevskogo “Brat’ia Karamazovy”: sovremennoe sostoianie izucheniia [Dostoevsky’s Novel The Brothers Karamazov: Current State of Research]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2007, pp. 523–564. (In Russ.)

7. Tikhomirov, B.N. “Evangel’skii plast v arkhitektonike rasskaza Dostoevskogo ‘Skvernyi anekdot’” [“The Gospel Stratum in the Architectonics of Dostoevsky’s Story A Nasty Anecdote”]. Dostoevskii i mirovaia kul’tura. Filologicheskii zhurnal, no. 4, 2018, pp. 65–77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2018-4-65-77