A Student that Has the Right: The Collective Anti-Raskolnikov in Donna Tartt’s The Secret History

Download:

Author: Nina S. Ishchenko

Information about the author:

PhD in Philosophy, Lugansk State Pedagogical University, Oboronnaya 2, 91011 Lugansk, LPR.

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

For citation:

Ishchenko, N.S. “A Student that Has the Right: The Collective Anti-Raskolnikov in Donna Tartt’s The Secret History.” Dostoevsky and World Culture. Philological journal, no. 3 (19), 2022, pp. 147–158. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2022-3-147-158

Received: 23 June 2022

Published: 25 Sept. 2022

Issue: 2022 no. 3 (19)

Department: DOSTOEVSKY IN THE 20TH AND 21ST CENTURIES

Pages: 147–158

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2022-3-147-158

EDN:

https://elibrary.ru/FHRUME

UDK: 821.161.1.0+2-1

BBK: 87+83.3(2=411.2).5+84.7

Keywords: Fyodor Dostoevsky, Donna Tartt, The Secret History, Crime and Punishment, Russian literature, orthodoxy, Dionysus, Übermensch, Nietzsche, ancient tragedy, Christianity.

Abstract: The paper focuses on Dostoevsky’s influence in D. Tartt’s novel The Secret History. The author shows how the main plot collisions of Crime and Punishment are inverted in the book of the American writer. The character of the book is the collective antagonist of Raskolnikov who recognizes the right to kill. The Übermensch is portrayed in the novel as the impeccable rationalist Mycroft Holmes. The spiritual force that guides Tartt’s characters on the path of transformation into an Übermensch is the pagan god Dionysus, to whom the students go to kill. The novel shows the self-destruction of a murderer who refused to see a person in his victim. The author’s voice in the novel is designed on the model of Dostoevsky’s poetics, using the reception of strange phrases uttered by the hero for no reason, as it happens during the wake with the family of a murdered student. At this moment, a phrase pops up in Richard’s head by itself: “It was I who killed the old woman and her sister Lizaveta with an axe and robbed her”. This phrase of Raskolnikov is a brief synopsis of the plot of Crime and Punishment. In Donna Tartt’s novel, this phrase expresses the author’s position, the author’s explanation of what is happening in the book: other characters in another world repeat Raskolnikov’s fate, and the author shows what this leads to. Raskolnikov managed to escape by converting to Christ and accepting his human nature. Donna Tartt’s Übermensch could not be saved, because instead of Christ he communicated with Dionysus. Taking communion with Dionysus in the ancient ritual of homophagy, students go to murder. The novel shows the self-destruction of all five murderers who refused to see a person in their victim: suicide (Henry), suicide attempt (Francis), alcohol and drugs up to complete desocialization (Charles), selfpunishment in the form of rejection of the joys of life and communication with people (Camilla), loneliness (Richard). Thus, Donna Tartt proves from the opposite the same idea that Dostoevsky expressed in his Orthodox novel: every life is priceless, murder destroys people and the world.

References

1. Antsyferova, O.Iu. “Antichnyi kod v universitetskom romane Donny Tartt ‘Tainaia istoriia’” [“The Ancient Code in Donna Tartt’s University Novel The Secret History”]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo, no. 2 (2), 2015, pp. 22–27. (In Russ.)

2. Belogortsev, V.N. “F.M. Dostoevskii i F. Nitsshe o cheloveke i ego sushchnosti” [“F.M. Dostoevsky and F. Nietzsche about Man and His Essence”]. Belogortsev, V.N., Polozhenkova, E.Iu., et al. Gumanitarii iuga Rossii [Humanities Scholars in South Russia], vol. 18, no. 2, 2016, pp. 150–159. (In Russ.)

3. Dostoevskii, F.M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 30 tomakh [Complete Works: in 30 vols]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1972–1990. (In Russ.)

4. Ivanov, Viach. Vs. Dionis i pradionisiistvo [Dionysus and Pradionisism]. St. Petersburg, Aleteiia Publ., 1994. 350 p. (In Russ.)

5. Ishimbaeva, G.G. “Dialektika priiatiia-otritsaniia idei Nitsshe v romane D. Tartt ‘Tainaia istoriia’” [“Dialectics of Acceptance-Denial of Nietzsche’s Ideas in D. Tartt’s Novel The Secret History”]. Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Istoriia. Pedagogika. Filologiia, no. 3, 2016, pp. 78–83. (In Russ.)

6. Kasatkina, T.A. Sviashchennoe v povsednevnom: dvusostavnyi obraz v proizvedeniiakh Dostoevskogo [The Sacred in the Ordinary: the Two-Folded Image in the Works of F.M. Dostoevsky]. Moscow, IWL RAS Publ., 2015. 528 p. (In Russ.)

7. Kacheev, D.A., and Kolchigin, S.Iu. “Mezhdu angelom i besom: ‘prokliatye voprosy’ Dostoevskogo” [“Between Angel and Demon: Dostoevsky’s ‘Cursed Questions’”]. Filosofiia. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, vol. 5, no 3, 2021, pp. 159–171. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17323/2587-8719-2021-3-159-171

8. Nazirova, E.I. “Intertekstual’nost’ romana Donny Tartt ‘Tainaia istoriia’” [“The Intertextuality of Donna Tartt’s Novel The Secret History”]. Iazyk. Kul’tura. Kommunikatsiia, no. 1, 2016. URL: https://journals.susu.ru/lcc/article/view/375/477/ Accessed 1 Aug. 2022. (In Russ.)

9. Shalimova, N.S. “Receptsiia antichnoi kul’tury v romane D. Tartt ‘Tainaia istoriia’” [“The Reception of Ancient Culture in D. Tartt’s Novel The Secret History”]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, vol. 14, issue 2, 2021, pp. 344–349. (In Russ.)

10. Shestov, L.I. Dostoevskii i Nitsshe. Apofeoz bespochvennosti [Dostoevsky and Nietzsche. The Apotheosis of Groundlessness]. Moscow, Azbuka Publ., 2016. 384 p. (In Russ.)

11. Tartt, D. The Secret History. New-York, Knopf Publ., 1992. 523 [6] p. (In English)