Download:

PDF

Author: Nikolay V. Kapustin
Information about the author:

DSc in Philology, professor, Department of National Philology, Ivanovo State University, Timiriazeva St., 5, bld. 6, 153025 Ivanovo, Russia.

https://оrcid.org/0000-0002-8739-0616 

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

For citation:

Kapustin, N.V. “The Poetics and Semantics of a Character’s Gaze in Dostoevsky’s Novel Crime and Punishment.” Dostoevsky and World Culture. Philological journal, no. 4 (28), 2024, pp. 57–71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2024-4-57-71

Received: 28 Aug. 2024
Published: 25 Dec. 2024
Issue: 2024 no. 4 (28)
Department: HERMENEUTICS. SLOW READING
Pages: 57-71
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2024-4-57-71
EDN:

https://elibrary.ru/JWULJK

UDK: 821.161.1.0+82.0
BBK: 83.3(2Рос=Рус)+83
Keywords: Dostoevsky, Crime and Punishment, psychologism, non-verbal semiotics, gaze, poetics, symbolism, emotional expressive style, baroque, symbol.
Abstract: This article argues that Fyodor Dostoevsky was a literary genius, capable of portraying the inner lives of his characters not only through verbal techniques — such as monologue, dialogue, and free indirect speech — but also through non-verbal means, vividly expressing his unique emotional style. The focus is primarily on the poetics and semantics of the gaze. In Dostoevsky’s novel Crime and Punishment, the gaze plays a pivotal role both in depicting characters’ emotions and in creating the novel’s intensely charged atmosphere. The article highlights the significance of the gaze in the novel and its rarity in world literature. Particular attention is given to the semantics of narrowed gaze. The visual behaviors of the characters are also examined as crucial elements of what Vladimir Toporov termed “fiction economy.” These behaviors contribute to the generation of symbolic imagery, such as the recurring image of the wall. The symbolic nature of the wall is analyzed in detail toward the end of the article. The observations presented demonstrate Dostoevsky’s exceptional artistry, challenging the widely held view of his artistic weaknesses — a perspective shared by Bunin, Nabokov, and other notable Russian writers.

References

1. Bakhtin, M.M. Sobranie sochinenii: v 7 tomakh [Collected Works: in 7 vols]. Moscow, Russkie slovari: Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury Publ., 1997–2012. (In Russ.)

2. Blok, A.A. Sobranie sochinenii: v 8 tomakh [Collected Works: in 8 vols]. Moscow; Leningrad, GIKhL Publ., 1960–1963. (In Russ.)

3. Burov, A.M. “Litso i amal’gama: analiz romana ‘Idiot’ Dostoevskogo” [“Face and Amalgam: An Analysis of Dostoevsky’s The Idiot”]. Estetika: Vchera. Segodnia. Vsegda [Esthetics: Yesterday. Today. Always], issue 1. Moscow, IP RAS Publ., 2005, pp. 180–196. (In Russ.)

4. Degteva, Ia.N. Chuzhoi vzgliad v tvorchestve F.M. Dostoevskogo [The Gaze of the Other in Dostoevsky’s Works: PhD Dissertation]. Voronezh, 2018. 177 p. (In Russ.)

5. Dostoevskii, F.M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 30 tomakh [Complete Works: in 30 vols]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1972–1990. (In Russ.)

6. Kasatkina, T.A. Kharakteriologiia Dosotevskogo. Tipologiia emotsional’no-tsennostnykh orientatsii [Characterology of Dostoevsky. A Typology of Emotional-Value Orientation]. Moscow, Nasledie Publ., 1996. 336 p. (In Russ.)

7. Kleiman, R.Ia. Dostoevskii: konstanty poetiki [Dostoevsky: Poetic Constants]. Chisinau, In-t mezhetnicheskikh issledovanii AN Respubliki Moldova Publ., 2001. 359 p. (In Russ.)

8. Kovalev, O.A. “Vzgliad i zhelanie mechtatelia v romane F.M. Dostoevskogo ‘Unizhennye i oskorblennye’” [“The Vision and Desire of a Dreamer in Dostoevsky’s Novel The Humiliated and Insulted”]. Izvestiia Altaiskogo gos. un-ta, no. 2, 2008, pp. 53–59. (In Russ.)

9. Kreidlin, G.E. Neverbal’naia semiotika [Non-Verbal Semiotics]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2002. 592 p. (In Russ.)

10. Krinitsyn, A.B. “O spetsifike visual’nogo mira i semantike ‘videnii’ v romane Dostoevskogo ‘Idiot’”. [“About the Peculiarities of the Visual World and Semantics of Gaze in the Novel The Idiot”]. Kasatkina, T.A., editor. Roman F.M. Dostoevskogo “Idiot”: sovremennoe sostoianie izucheniia [Dostoevsky’s Novel The Idiot: Current State of Research]. Moscow, Nasledie Publ., 2001, pp. 170–205. (In Russ.)

11. Likhachev, D.S. “Chelovek v literature Drevnei Rusi” [“Man in Ancient Russian Literature”]. Izbrannye raboty: v 3 tomakh [Selected Works: in 3 vols], vol. 3. Leningrad, Khudozhestvennaia literatura Publ., 1987, pp. 77–97. (In Russ.)

12. Pukhachev, S.B. Poetika zhesta v proizvedeniiakh F.M. Dostoevskogo: na materiale romanov “Prestuplenie i nakazanie”, “Idiot”, “Besy”, “Podrostok”, “Brat’ia Karamazovy” [The Poetics of Gesture in Dostoevsky’s Works: On the Materials of the Novels Crime and Punishment, The Idiot, The Devils, The Adolescent, The Brothers Karamazov: PhD Dissertation]. Velikii Novgorod, 2006. 224 p. (In Russ.)

13. Suslova, A.P. Gody blizosti s Dostoevskim: dnevnik — povest’ — pis’ma [The Years of Intimacy with Dostoevsky: Diary — A Tale — Letters]. Reprint of the 1928 Edition. Moscow, RUSSLIT Publ., 1991. 192 p. (In Russ.)

14. Terts, A. Sobranie sochinenii: v 2 tomakh [Collected Works: in 2 vols], vol. 1. Moscow, SP “Start” Publ., 1992. 670 p. (In Russ.)

15. Toporov, V.N. “O strukture romana Dostoevskogo v sviazi s arkhaichnymi skhemami mifologichesskogo myshleniia (‘Prestuplenie i nakazanie’)” [“About the Structure of Dostoevsky’s Novel in the Light of Archaic Schemes of Mythological Thinking (Crime and Punishment)”]. Toporov, V.N. Mif. Ritual. Simbol. Obraz: issledovaniia v oblasti mifopoeticheskogo: izbrannoe [Myth. Ritual. Symbol. Image: Research on Mythopoetics: Selected Works]. Moscow, Progress: Kul’tura Publ., 1995, pp. 193–258. (In Russ.)

16. Chicherin, A.V. “Dostoevskii i barokko” [“Dostoevsky and the Baroque”]. Chicherin, A.V. Ritm obraza: stilisticheskie problemy [The Rhythm of the Image: Problems of Stylistics]. Moscow, Sov. pisatel’ Publ., 1978, pp. 181–192. (In Russ.)